If you "click" into one of those meetings for more details, you can also join the meeting as essentially a cohost, you cannot join invisibly. More explanation and links in this recent comment: Īn admin, from a dashboard, can see all meetings currently running. But the data stream has more than enough data points to make every such impression. Those strong impressions accrue into an image of bias. hurt) those feelings, it makes a strong impression. They have the opposite image to yours, but they have it for the same reason you do: they feel very strongly about the issue, and so when they run across instances in the data stream that touch (i.e. To take the current topic, for example, they say that HN has an extremely anti-China bias, any comments that try to defend China or Chinese people instantly get downvoted, the mods are in on the racism, and so on. People with opposite views have the opposite image. But that image is just an inverse reflection of your own views. That gives you a generalized image of what goes on here. everybody) are far more likely to notice, and to weight more strongly, the cases of moderation that you dislike or disagree with. It's a natural artifact of the well-known cognitive biases that affect these perceptions. I'd be careful about that feeling that there's a double standard. People get moderated here for posting flamebait about western countries and governments all the time. I don't have a mind reader (or even a software alert). You guys need to let me know that you have questions like this, assuming you want an answer. for the data might be stored in Tianjin datacenter, needless to say whose keys are in the hands of CCP - I guarantee that but cannot provide proof.Įdit: past comments that were downvoted (and flagged): The entire world has given up video/audio/screen/application privacy in a snap. I am gonna fire off some anon emails to WSJ/NYTimes/WaPo/Guardian to create some awareness and perhaps they can dig further into Chinese influence in using Zoom. should be one of the most important things to talk about on "Hacker" news forum. Fearlessly criticizing CCP or the NSA, or Israeli intelligence agency or whatever. But, I would personally (some may disagree) say that we should also criticize bad parts of culture too.that's for another day or a different forum.Ĭan we just get past the my country your country bullshit on HN and talk about privacy implications especially from the world's largest surveillance network? It is one thing to be spied upon for advertisement tracking, an entirely another to be spied upon by a brutal authoritarian government. Obviously personal attacks and racism is not tolerable. But apparently, saying anything against China on HN is an automatic ban for creating a flame war. Surveillance prospects, doesn't matter where they originate - US or China or Country X - need to be discussed and examined. There are things that I cannot say due to our employment contract and NDA, but to say the least, we are looking into this matter. I've said this time and again only to get downvotes since there is no proof or substantiation about the CCP surveillance claims. I would not be surprised at all if someone reports vulnerabilities in Zoom, whether deliberate or accidental. I guess this is what you get when you outsource software engineering. This just screams sloppy software engineering quality. Now I'm not a Mac programming expert but I cannot understand why Zoom needs to change its own preference settings this way. The binary .app/Contents/Frameworks/zmLoader.bundle/Contents/MacOS/zmLoader invokes system(3) on three separate occasions in two functions: - and -.Īnd looking at what the string was, it's just a fucking call to defaults(1). I just verified this is the case on the latest version of Zoom for Mac. To my utter horror, the Zoom binary is shelling out by calling system(3) on the fucking main thread. So I grabbed a sample of the process via Activity Monitor. When I installed Zoom for Mac for the first time, I noticed it took a while to start up and caused beachballing. I really hate to mention this, but this perhaps answered an question of mine about why quality of code in Zoom is so low.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |